IV International Company Limited

Official distributor in Vietnam for leading medical manufacturers and brands
About Us

IV International Company Limited

Official distributor in Vietnam for leading medical manufacturers and brands
About Us
IV Meditech Company

Official distributor in Vietnam for medical manufacturers and brands

Official distributor in Vietnam for medical manufacturers and brands

About us

About us

IV Meditech is a subsidiary of Vietnam India International Company Limited - a company with investment fields such as FMCG, cooking oil, animal feed and other raw/finished products.

View More
Our Mission

Our Mission

IV MEDITECH is the official distributor in Vietnam for leading medical manufacturers and brands such as MEDOFFICE (Turkey), CLEAN IS (FRANCE), HUGEMED (China), JME (India),

View More

Our business and services

Products for babies

Incubator for babies - INC 200

Newborn bassinet, Anti-infective cream, Resuscitation and heating bed, Jaundice treatment lamp

View more
Care, nursing

Dry shower gloves

Nursing care services: Dry shower gloves, Dry shampoo caps, Oral hygiene tools

View more
Anesthesia and operating equipment

Endotracheal tube

Endotracheal tube with silicone pad, Endotracheal tube, Endotracheal tube

View more
View all products

Cooperate with reputable partners to bring customers the best products

IV Meditech provides equipment for the most prestigious hospitals.

IV Meditech provides equipment for the most prestigious hospitals.

Northern

Central

South

IV Meditech is pleased to serve customers.

IV Meditech is pleased to serve customers.

N04B, T1 Lanmak, Diplomatic Corps, Xuan Tao Ward, Bac Tu Liem District, Hanoi
Pages

JA COMPANY

26 years
On the other hand, we denounce with righteous indignation and dislike men who are so beguiled and demoralized by the charms of pleasure of the moment, so blinded by desire, that they cannot foresee
Pages

To take a trivial example

To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?


Page 3 of 3